Dont Just Stand There Reactions to Prejudiced Comments...

Don’t Just Stand There is an essay written by Diane Cole. It was first published in 1989 in a New York Times publication. She advises her audience about how to react to prejudice comments and jokes. However, her argument is not credible because she fails to mention vital information that would help to support her argument, and there are too many logical fallacies. Cole omits important details that may have helped to support her argument. Cole’s argument s not credible becuse she fails to give any back round information on the guy who told the joke, For example, who is he? Is he a person of authority? Is he the workplace clown? Is he an associate or friend? Who knows, maybe this guy is Jewish also. It seems a bit odd that these two†¦show more content†¦For instance, in paragraph two Cole alleges that everyone in the office knew that she was Jewish. If this were true, not only did this guy blatantly insult her, he did so in the presence of colleagues. Most workpl aces enforce a zero tolerance rule on an incident such as this. Why weren’t there any disciplinary actions taken? Cole should have elaborated more on the details in this situation. There are many fallacies Cole uses to help her achieve her purpose for writing. How ever, these fallacies help to facilitate the idea that her argument is not credible. One of the many types of fallacies used in her arguments is called false authorities, which are assumptions that because one is an expert in one particular field this person can be credible in another. For instance, in paragraph seven Cole employs an assertion from Cherie Brown who’s title is executive director of the National Coalition Building Institute which is a Boston based training program. Why would she use an assertion from some whose title does not coincide with her argument? This is like asking a plumber to install a door bell. In the attempt to persuade someone into taking action on a certain issue one should alwa ys utilize the appropriate authorities. Cole also uses another fallacy called oversimplification. This is a statement or argument that leaves out relevant considerations in order to imply that there is a single cause or solution for a complex problem.Show MoreRelatedVampire Diaries61771 Words   |  248 Pagesdance? she said softly. Im playing with fire, with something I dont understand, she thought suddenly. And in that instant she realized that she was frightened. Her heart began to pound violently. It was as if those green eyes spoke to some part of her that was buried deep beneath the surface—and that part was screaming danger at her. Some instinct older than civilization was telling her to run, to flee. She didnt move. Dont miss these exciting books from HarperPaperbacks! THE VAMPIRERead MorePeculiarities of Euphemisms in English and Difficulties in Their Translation19488 Words   |  78 Pages by contradiction, or by irrelevant statements, if any; so that the reader is forced to invent statements of his own and they are liable to conflict with one another. This type is perceived the most clearly when a joke is implied, for the reader is meant to be conscious of the joke - the intelligent reader, of the means also (Allot N.,2005,p.82). Ambiguity caused by euphemisms also occurs when the two meanings of the word, the two values of the ambiguity [or equivocality], are the two oppositeRead MoreAn Introduction to Intercultural Communication29172 Words   |  117 Pagespeople from different cultures, empathy is vital. Through putting yourself in someone elses shoes you come to see or appreciate their point of view. 3. Involve Involving others in your world and involving yourself in others empowers and educates. Dont build walls between people but learn from one another. 4. Avoid Herd Mentality Herd mentality refers to a closed and one dimensional approach. Such a way of thinking curbs creativity, innovation and advancement as people are restricted in how toRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 Pagesselling their ideas—and defend them against critical scrutiny. This is great practice for the arena of business to come. NEW TO THIS EDITION In contrast to the early editions, which examined only notable mistakes, and based on your favorable comments about recent editions, I have again included some well-known successes. While mistakes provide valuable learning insights, we can also learn from successes and find nuggets by comparing the unsuccessful with the successful. With the addition